Mark A. Berman (NYLJ/Rick Kopstein)
A series of well-reasoned decisions recently issued by the New York County Supreme Court plumbed the nature of litigation holds and the preservation of electronically stored information (ESI), giving guidance to litigators with excellent practice tips. Some of the issues addressed were somewhat unusual, such as whether to require a litigation hold to a foreign company which did little business in New York state, and an entity’s partners’ personal responsibility to fund ESI expenses. Or they dealt with the more common concerns of preserving text messages and tape recordings stored on cell phones, the forensic review of a server when a litigation hold had not been implemented, the timing of when a litigation hold should have been put in place, or the insufficiency of the record to move for spoliation sanctions.
To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.
Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at email@example.com