Scott E. Mollen, a partner at Herrick, Feinstein and an adjunct professor at St. John's University School of Law reviews 'WDF v. The Trustees of Columbia Univ.', where the court held that "no damage for delay" clauses are generally enforceable, while also discussing the exceptions to this rule.
February 21, 2017 at 02:01 PM
1 minute read
Construction—”No Damage For Delays” Clauses Are Generally Valid—Court Discussed the Exceptions to Such Rule
This decision involved pre-answer motions to dismiss by a defendant University and a defendant construction manager (CM). The plaintiff was a subcontractor.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
