Land Use—Court Denied Motion to Disqualify Lawyer on Grounds That He and His Law Firm Represented Both the Property Owner and a Village in Litigation—Neither Formal Nor Informal Attorney-Client Relationship Existed—Failure to Show Confidential Information Had Been Disclosed, the Advocate-Witness Rule Would Be Violated or Trial Would Be Tainted
This case arose from an alleged breach of two settlement agreements (agreements) between the plaintiff owner (owner) of real property (property) and a village and its board of trustees (village) on one side and third parties on the other.
