Editor’s Note: This article is the fourth article discussing findings about what the four Appellate Division departments have been deciding about legal malpractice during the last five years. Future articles will continue to share findings from the data set, containing 357 published decisions. Previous articles may be found here.
Like all of professional malpractice, American legal malpractice is a common law realm. Judge-made doctrines—mostly the law of torts, contracts, and agency, with issues of fiduciary duty often present—govern disputes between attorneys and clients. Analyzing any legal malpractice claim necessarily calls for attention to the common law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]