A Manhattan judge who said he would determine the ownership of "Stevie" the dog according to the "best interests of all concerned"—including the dog—now says that he "simply erred" and that "the correct law is the law of property, and this court will determine and award possession of Stevie according to that law, and no other."
November 10, 2015 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
A Manhattan judge who said he would determine the ownership of “Stevie” the dog according to the “best interests of all concerned”—including the dog—has changed his position.
Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron said he had “simply erred” and that “the correct law is the law of property, and this court will determine and award possession of Stevie according to that law, and no other.”
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
