Lawyers defending the former leaders of Dewey & LeBoeuf disagreed Thursday on whether the judge should intervene in the jury's marathon deliberation session.
October 16, 2015 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Lawyers defending the former leaders of Dewey & LeBoeuf disagreed Thursday on whether the judge should intervene in the jury’s marathon deliberation session.
After 19 full days of deliberating, the jury went home again Thursday without reaching a complete verdict.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
