DAWN M. HUGHES, ADMITTED AS DAWN MARIE HUGHES, AN ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR-ATLAW. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, PETITIONER; DAWN M. HUGHES, res

MATTER OF DAWN M. HUGHES, ADMITTED AS DAWN MARIE HUGHES, AN ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR-ATLAW. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, PETITIONER; DAWN M. HUGHES, res — (ATTORNEY REGISTRATION NO. 4019303) — Motion by the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District: (1) to suspend the respondent from the practice of law pending the consideration of charges of professional misconduct against her pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.4(l)(1) (i) and (iii), upon a finding that she is guilty of professional misconduct immediately threatening the public interest based upon her failure to cooperate with the lawful demands of the Grievance Committee and other uncontroverted evidence of professional misconduct; (2) to authorize the institution and prosecution of a disciplinary proceeding against the respondent; and (3) to direct that a hearing be held before a Special Referee appointed to hear and report with respect to each of the issues raised by the charges set forth in a verified petition dated May 12, 2015, and any answer thereto. Application by the respondent for a 45-day extension of time to assemble the bank and bookkeeping records sought by the Grievance Committee. The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on January 23, 2002, under the name Dawn Marie Hughes.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

MATTER OF DAWN M. HUGHES, ADMITTED AS DAWN MARIE HUGHES, AN ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR-ATLAW. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, PETITIONER; DAWN M. HUGHES, res — (ATTORNEY REGISTRATION NO. 4019303) — Motion by the Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District: (1) to suspend the respondent from the practice of law pending the consideration of charges of professional misconduct against her pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.4(l)(1) (i) and (iii), upon a finding that she is guilty of professional misconduct immediately threatening the public interest based upon her failure to cooperate with the lawful demands of the Grievance Committee and other uncontroverted evidence of professional misconduct; (2) to authorize the institution and prosecution of a disciplinary proceeding against the respondent; and (3) to direct that a hearing be held before a Special Referee appointed to hear and report with respect to each of the issues raised by the charges set forth in a verified petition dated May 12, 2015, and any answer thereto. Application by the respondent for a 45-day extension of time to assemble the bank and bookkeeping records sought by the Grievance Committee. The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on January 23, 2002, under the name Dawn Marie Hughes.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto and upon the papers filed in support of the application and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is

DAWN M. HUGHES, ADMITTED AS DAWN MARIE HUGHES, AN ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR-ATLAW. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE FOR THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, PETITIONER; DAWN M. HUGHES, res

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal