Reversing the trial court's refusal to grant a summary judgment motion, a Second Department said an injured pedestrian established that the driver that hit her was negligent and that she was free from comparative fault.
August 12, 2015 at 08:00 AM
1 minute read
The facts surrounding a rainy early-morning collision between a car and a pedestrian were enough to establish the driver’s liability, a divided Brooklyn appellate court found.
The 3-1 majority of the Appellate Division, Second Department, said pedestrian Marie Castiglione established that driver Karen Kruse was negligent and that Castiglione was free from comparative fault.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
