A federal judge is steering clear of a Cayuga Indian tribe's dispute with an upstate municipality over its attempt to enforce an anti-gambling statute, ruling that the faction of Cayugas bringing the suit has not established standing under the U.S. Constitution.
May 28, 2015 at 05:00 AM
1 minute read
A federal judge is steering clear of a Cayuga Indian tribe’s dispute with an upstate municipality over its attempt to enforce an anti-gambling statute.
Northern District Judge David Hurd ruled that the faction of Cayugas bringing the suit titled Cayuga Nation v. Tanner, 5:14-cv-1317, has not established standing under the U.S. Constitution.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
