Third-party subpoenas seeking information from members of a group accused of anti-Semitic motives in opposing a Hasidic housing development are too broad and invasive to be enforced, a federal judge has ruled.
April 10, 2015 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Third-party subpoenas seeking information from members of a group accused of anti-Semitic motives in opposing a Hasidic housing development are too broad and invasive to be enforced, a federal judge has ruled.
Southern District Judge Katherine Forrest quashed parts of subpoenas that focused on individuals in a group that is allegedly pursuing a “mission” to block Hasidic Jews from moving to the village of Bloomingburg and the town of Mamakating.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
