Two Manhattan Housing Court judges have reached opposite conclusions regarding the same issue in the same eight-unit Upper West Side apartment building.
March 03, 2015 at 11:00 AM
1 minute read
Two Manhattan Housing Court judges have reached opposite conclusions regarding the same issue in the same eight-unit Upper West Side apartment building.
Judge Phyllis Saxe (See Profile) ruled for the landlord Feb. 23 in 1664 3rd Ave LLC v. Jillian Murray, 58576/13. But last September, Judge Jack Stoller (See Profile) ruled in favor of a tenant in the same building in Ouyang v. Cromelin, 2014 NY Slip Op 51416.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
