Three weeks after a jury found Arab Bank civilly liable for the material support of Hamas terror attacks, the bank moved for judgment in its favor, arguing the verdict was unsupported and riddled with factual and legal errors.
October 14, 2014 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Three weeks after a jury found Arab Bank civilly liable for the material support of Hamas terror attacks, the bank moved for judgment in its favor, arguing the verdict was unsupported and riddled with factual and legal errors.
At the very least, the bank asked Eastern District Judge Brian Cogan (See Profile) on Friday to order a new trial in the closely-watched case “to correct this miscarriage of justice.”
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
