The state Court of Appeals declined Thursday to hear an appeal as of right to the denial of the attempt by state judges to win a retroactive salary increase between 2005 and 2009, saying that no substantial constitutional question was involved in the appeal.
June 06, 2014 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The state Court of Appeals declined Thursday to hear an appeal as of right to the denial of the attempt by state judges to win a retroactive salary increase between 2005 and 2009.
The court said in Pines v. State of New York, SSD 24, that no substantial constitutional question was involved in the appeal. Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman took no part in the determination.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
