A party asked to produce remotely stored emails in "native format" should do more than just forward them to preserve the original data, a federal judge has held, but declined to hold the party in contempt for failing to do so.
April 16, 2014 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
A party asked to produce remotely stored emails in “native format” should do more than just forward them to preserve the original data, a federal judge has held, but declined to hold the party in contempt for failing to do so.
In Sexton v. Lecavalier, 1:13-cv-08557, handed down Friday, Southern District Judge Analisa Torres (See Profile) also refused to sanction the party requesting contempt for bad faith.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
