A Manhattan judge has refused to dismiss a legal malpractice suit against Cullen and Dykman which asserts the firm had a conflict of interest by representing two parties in a dispute among siblings that resulted in damages to the plaintiffs.
February 28, 2014 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
A Manhattan judge has refused to dismiss a legal malpractice suit against Cullen and Dykman which asserts the firm had a conflict of interest by representing two parties in a dispute among siblings which resulted in damages to the plaintiffs.
“At least some of the litigations arguably involved a conflict of interest,” wrote Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Marcy Friedman (See Profile) in W.S. Wilson Corp. v. Cullen and Dykman, 654176/2012.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
