Per Curiam
Iannelli, who operated a day care center that Lynch’s daughter attended, appealed from a Justice Court decision which awarded Lynch $642.75 on her counterclaim, but which the court reduced by a $135 award to Iannelli. Iannelli sought to recover fees she believed were due under the parties’ agreement, and Lynch asserted as Iannelli failed to provide her with timely receipts in an acceptable form, which she knew Lynch required, she was unable to obtain a $642.75 reimbursement from a flexible spending account (FSA). Iannelli appealed questioning if Lynch proved her entitlement to recover on her counterclaim. The panel concluded that a reasonable person in Lynch’s position would be justified in understanding that she would receive receipts from Iannelli in a form and pursuant to a schedule which was adequate for her to receive reimbursement from the FSA. It noted the parties disputed if Iannelli provided adequate receipts to Lynch, and no definitive documentary proof was provided. Yet, the panel stated by its award of $642.74 on Lynch’s counterclaim, the justice court implicitly found Iannelli had an obligation to provide Lynch with such receipts, and failed to perform under such obligation. Thus, it affirmed the decision.
