Per Curiam
Lherisson appealed from a Civil Court order denying defendant's motion to vacate a prior Oct. 7, 2011 order made upon his failure to appear on the return date of his prior motion. Upon such vacatur, Lherisson sought to modify the terms of an income execution. Educational Resources Institute (ERI) sought to recover $90,000 due under six promissory notes executed by Lherission for student loans. A default judgment was entered against him in 2004 and the parties entered into a stipulation staying enforcement of the judgment, and setting forth payment terms. Lherisson defaulted under the stipulation and ERI garnished his wages. A second stipulation was entered into, upon which Lherisson defaulted. Lherisson filed for bankruptcy, but his loans survived the discharge, and ERI again garnished his wages. Numerous orders to show cause were filed by Lherisson, which were denied upon his failure to appear. He now argued medical reasons for failing to appear and alleged 10 percent garnishment of wages was excessive. The unanimous panel affirmed the civil court's ruling finding Lherisson's prolonged history of chronic defaults, his dilatory conduct and complete disregard of court orders justified a finding the defaults were intentional, and inexcusable.