A unanimous Second Department panel ruled on Wednesday that, despite some mitigating factors, Mitchell Drucker, who was sued by the SEC in 2006 for selling stock in a company he worked for and advising his father to do the same, did not deserve leniency, saying he had not shown remorse.
July 19, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
A Long Island lawyer has been suspended from practicing law for three years for selling stock in a nutritional supplements company he worked for, and advising his father to do the same, based on insider information.
A unanimous Appellate Division, Second Department, panel ruled on Wednesday in Matter of Drucker, 04932/10, that, despite some mitigating factors, Mitchell Drucker of Suffolk County did not deserve leniency, saying he had not shown remorse.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
