The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday appeared skeptical of an Indiana farmer's claim that Monsanto lost its right to control the use of its herbicide-resistant soybean after the first sale of that self-replicating seed.
February 20, 2013 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday appeared skeptical of an Indiana farmer’s claim that Monsanto lost its right to control the use of its herbicide-resistant soybean after the first sale of that self-replicating seed.
The case, Bowman v. Monsanto, 11-796, has potential implications for a wide range of industries and has drawn amicus briefs from intellectual property lawyers, biotechnology companies, agricultural organizations, food-safety groups and others.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
