A judge has declined to allow a request to substitute a claim for fraudulent concealment for one of spoliation of evidence in a complaint in a defective firearm case after finding the plaintiffs' chances of surviving a motion to dismiss the new charge were low.
December 26, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
A judge has declined to allow an amendment to a complaint in a defective firearm case after finding the plaintiffs’ chances of surviving a motion to dismiss the new charge were low.
Northern District Judge David Hurd (See Profile) ruled on the plaintiffs’ request to substitute a claim for fraudulent concealment for one of spoliation of evidence.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
