Although Manhattan Surrogate Nora Anderson was acquitted by a Supreme Court jury of breaking state law by accepting contributions above the legal limit for the 2008 primary from patron and former employer Seth Rubenstein, the Commission on Judicial Conduct found her conduct nonetheless violated judicial ethics rules.
October 11, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Manhattan Surrogate Nora Anderson (See Profile) should be censured for accepting improper contributions during her 2008 campaign, the state Commission on Judicial Conduct announced yesterday.
Although Anderson was acquitted by a Supreme Court jury of breaking the state’s Election Law by taking contributions above the legal limit for the 2008 primary from her patron and former employer Seth Rubenstein, the commission found her conduct nonetheless violated judicial ethics rules.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
