In their Appellate Division Review, E. Leo Milonas and Frederick A. Brodie, partners at Pillsbury Winthrop, write: Some cases, including in New York's Appellate Division, call for decisions that try to join justice with conscience. Judges strive to reach results that are not only legally correct, but also fair and just.
July 20, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
‘There is a higher court than courts of justice and that is the court of conscience,” wrote Mahatma Gandhi.
Some cases, including in New York’s Appellate Division, call for decisions that try to join justice with conscience. Judges strive to reach results that are not only legally correct, but also fair and just. Ideally, the court of conscience can then issue a quick concurrence.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Labor & Employment practice in our Hartford, New Haven, or Stamford office. Candidates shou...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
