Today we deal with the question of the admissibility of uncharged misconduct evidence, which Edward Imwinkelried, professor at the University of California, Davis School of Law, opined is “the single most important issue in contemporary criminal evidence law.”1 He writes that Rule 404(b) has emerged as one of the most cited rules in the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE).2 Clearly, the question of the admissibility of such evidence holds the potential for delivering the greatest damage to a defendant’s cause. FRE 404(b) governs the admissibility of prior other crimes, wrongs or acts, separate from the crimes charged in the indictment.3 The rule prohibits the admission of such evidence if it tends to prove propensity, meaning if the defendant did it before, he probably did it here.4
To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.
Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org