Acting Supreme Court Justice Anil C. Singh rejected arguments by developers of a luxury Upper West Side condo that the offering plan drawn up by a Stroock & Stroock & Lavan attorney mistakenly included a Sept. 1, 2008, rescission date when it should have been Sept. 1, 2009.
January 25, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Rebuffing a developer’s claim that one of its outside lawyers had botched a Manhattan condominium offering plan, a state judge has ordered the developer to return $16 million in down-payments.
Acting Supreme Court Justice Anil C. Singh (See Profile) rejected arguments by developers of The Rushmore, a luxury Upper West Side condo, that the offering plan drawn up by a Stroock & Stroock & Lavan attorney mistakenly included a Sept. 1, 2008, rescission date when it should have been Sept. 1, 2009.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
