X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Decided and Entered: June 26, 2003 89316 ________________________________ In the Matter of WILLIAM X., a Neglected Child. CLINTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT of SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondent; WILLIAM Y., Appellant, et al., Respondent. ________________________________ Calendar Date: May 28, 2003 Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ. __________ Dan Gaudreau, Plattsburgh, for appellant. Jack Dee, Clinton County Department of Social Services, Plattsburgh, for respondent. __________ Rose, J. Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Clinton County (Lawliss, J.), entered December 13, 2000, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10, to extend placement of one of respondents’ children with petitioner for a period of one year. Respondent William Y. (hereinafter the father) and respondent Susan X. are the parents of William and Evelyn, children who were previously adjudicated by Family Court to be neglected and placed in petitioner’s custody for a period of one year commencing December 6, 1999. This Court upheld Family Court’s adjudication of neglect with respect to the father and the order of placement on appeal (290 AD2d 817 [2002], appeal dismissed 98 NY2d 666 [2002]). In December 2000, Family Court extended placement of William with petitioner for an additional period of one year. The father appealed from this order as well. On November 28, 2001, however, before the appeal was decided, Family Court issued a modified order directing that William be returned to the custody of his parents. The father’s appellate counsel now seeks to be relieved of his assignment on the ground that the termination of William’s placement with petitioner renders the father’s appeal moot. Inasmuch as we agree that the modified order renders the extension of placement moot, the appeal must be dismissed (see Matter of Lisa Z. [Sherry X.], 276 AD2d 853, 853 [2000]; Matter of Jamie EE. [Gail FF.], 232 AD2d 761, 762 [1996]). In light of this, it is unnecessary to address appellate counsel’s request to be relieved. Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain and Kane, JJ., concur. ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs. ENTER: Michael J. Novack Clerk of the Court

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
April 25, 2024
Dubai

Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.


Learn More
April 29, 2024 - May 01, 2024
Aurora, CO

The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.


Learn More

A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...


Apply Now ›

We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...


Apply Now ›

We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...


Apply Now ›
04/15/2024
Connecticut Law Tribune

MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS


View Announcement ›
04/11/2024
New Jersey Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
04/08/2024
Daily Report

Daily Report 1/2 Page Professional Announcement 60 Days


View Announcement ›