Matter of FORD

Decided and Entered: December 18, 2003
94166
In the Matter of the Claim of NORMA M. FORD,
Appellant.
COMMISSIONER OF LABOR,
Respondent.
________________________________
Calendar Date: October 29, 2003
Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Lahti.....

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Decided and Entered: December 18, 2003 94166 In the Matter of the Claim of NORMA M. FORD, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent. ________________________________ Calendar Date: October 29, 2003 Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ. __________ Norma M. Ford, New York City, appellant pro se. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York City (Bessie Bazile of counsel), for respondent. __________ Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 21, 2002, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant voluntarily left her employment as a coordinator for a health management organization without good cause. The record establishes that claimant felt harassed by her supervisor because of his threats of disciplinary measures and discharge due to insubordination and her attitude. Although claimant had requested a transfer to another department within the company, she quit before anything became available. Criticism from a supervisor of an employee’s job performance (see Matter of Bejarano [Commissioner of Labor], 301 AD2d 726, 726 [2003]) or a resignation in anticipation of discharge (see Matter of Rugelis [Pfaudler Co. - Sweeney], 248 AD2d 784, 784 [1998]) does not constitute good cause for leaving employment. Inasmuch as continuing work was available to claimant, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision. We have reviewed claimant’s remaining contentions and find that they are unsupported by the record. Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs. ENTER: Michael J. Novack Clerk of the Court

Matter of FORD

Decided and Entered: December 18, 2003 94166 In the Matter of the Claim of NORMA M. FORD, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent. ________________________________ Calendar Date: October 29, 2003 Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Lahti.....

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal

Decided and Entered: December 18, 2003
94166
In the Matter of the Claim of NORMA M. FORD,
Appellant.
COMMISSIONER OF LABOR,
Respondent.
________________________________
Calendar Date: October 29, 2003
Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Lahti.....