X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Decided and Entered: August 11, 2005 97680 ________________________________ In the Matter of KENNETH MARCH et al., Appellants, v CITY OF ALBANY, Respondent. ___________________________ Calendar Date: June 9, 2005 Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ. __________ Carola, Bagnoli & Tollisen, Mechanicville (Jeffrey N. Bagnoli of counsel), for appellants. John J. Reilly, Corporation Counsel, Albany (Terrence A. Gorman of counsel), for respondent. __________ Carpinello, J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Malone Jr., J.), entered May 18, 2004 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioners’ application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to remove a lien against their real property. In February 2003, respondent ordered that a vacant structure on petitioners’ property be demolished out of concerns for public safety. It then billed petitioners for the $15,000 in demolition costs and informed them that their failure to pay this sum would result in it being added to their tax bill as a lien against the property. Petitioners commenced this proceeding seeking to set aside the bill and remove the lien. Following a hearing, Supreme Court dismissed the petition, and we now affirm. The record supports Supreme Court’s factual finding that petitioners’ structure was in imminent danger of collapse and, thus, posed a danger to the public such that respondent was authorized to demolish it without notice to them under Albany City Code § 133-55 (A) and (B). Respondent’s deputy fire chief, who has received extensive training on building construction and collapse in his near three decade tenure with the fire department, testified that he was alerted to a partial collapse of the structure on February 28, 2003. On that date, he personally inspected the building at ground level, as well as directed a fire captain with 25 years experience to inspect it on an aerial ladder. These inspections revealed, among other conditions, fallen bricks in the vicinity, a collapse at the roof level, a collapsed rear wall which was pulling away from the side walls and roof, a deteriorating front soffit and cornice, bowing of the north and south walls, collapse of the structure’s northwest corner, floors that had shifted and a crack in the foundation of the north wall. The fire captain’s aerial observations specifically revealed excessive snow and ice on the roof, as well as sagging floors. In the deputy chief’s opinion, the building was in danger of imminent collapse and a threat to public safety (cf. Scott v Town of Duanesburg, 176 AD2d 989, 991 [1991]).1 Significantly, Supreme Court found the deputy chief to be “the most credible witness” at the hearing. Since the record supports a finding that demolition of the building was required by an emergency situation, namely, it was in imminent danger of collapse and posed an immediate danger to the public (see Albany City Code § 133-55 [A], [B]; see e.g. Merino v City of Middleton, 272 AD2d 454, 454-455 [2000]; Starik v City of New York, 68 AD2d 936 [1979]; cf. Calamusa v Town of Brookhaven, 272 AD2d 426, 427 [2000]; Scott v Town of Duanesburg, supra at 991), respondent was entitled to recover from petitioners the cost incurred in abating the emergency (see Albany City Code § 133-55 [C]). Thus, the judgment dismissing the petition is affirmed. Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain and Mugglin, JJ., concur. ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
April 18, 2024
New York, NY

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!


Learn More
April 25, 2024
Dubai

Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.


Learn More

Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...


Apply Now ›

Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...


Apply Now ›

At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...


Apply Now ›
04/15/2024
Connecticut Law Tribune

MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS


View Announcement ›
04/11/2024
New Jersey Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
04/08/2024
Daily Report

Daily Report 1/2 Page Professional Announcement 60 Days


View Announcement ›