People v Baker

Decided and Entered: January 4, 2007
16426

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,
v
PAUL S. BAKER, Appellant.

Calendar D.....

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Decided and Entered: January 4, 2007 16426 ________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v PAUL S. BAKER, Appellant. ________________________________ Calendar Date: November 27, 2006 Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ. __________ Richard Marris, Syracuse, for appellant. Donald F. Cerio Jr., District Attorney, Wampsville (Jeffrey A. Aumell of counsel), for respondent. __________ Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Madison County (DiStefano, J.), rendered December 6, 2005, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of grand larceny in the third degree. Defendant, indicted for grand larceny in the third degree, pleaded guilty. Under the terms of the plea agreement, defendant was to be sentenced, as a second felony offender, to 2 to 4 years in prison if he paid restitution prior to sentencing and, if he did not, to 21/2 to 5 years in prison. Defendant did not pay restitution prior to sentencing and was sentenced as a second felony offender to 21/2 to 5 years in prison. He now appeals. We affirm. We find no merit to defendant’s contention that his sentence was improperly enhanced due to his failure to pay restitution. The terms of the plea agreement included the lengthier 21/2 to 5-year sentence in the event that defendant did not pay restitution and the record discloses that defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent guilty plea. Contrary to defendant’s claim, Penal Law § 65.10 is inapplicable as he was not ordered to make restitution as a condition of a sentence or probation or conditional discharge. Furthermore, given defendant’s lengthy criminal record and his failure to pay restitution, we do not find any extraordinary circumstances or an abuse of discretion warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Greene, 195 AD2d 888, 889 [1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 850 [1993]). Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

People v Baker

Decided and Entered: January 4, 2007 16426 ________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v PAUL S. BAKER, Appellant. ________________________________ Calendar D.....

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal

Decided and Entered: January 4, 2007
16426

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,
v
PAUL S. BAKER, Appellant.

Calendar D.....