People v Dippolito

Decided and Entered: February 15, 2007
16537

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,
v
RICHARD DIPPOLITO, Appellant.

Cale.....

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Decided and Entered: February 15, 2007 16537 ________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v RICHARD DIPPOLITO, Appellant. ________________________________ Calendar Date: December 27, 2006 Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ. __________ Christian J. Root, Binghamton, for appellant, and appellant pro se. Gerald F. Mollen, District Attorney, Binghamton (Joann Rose Parry of counsel), for respondent. __________ Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered September 16, 2005, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree. Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree in satisfaction of a 23-count indictment. In accordance with the plea agreement, he was sentenced as a second felony offender to 31/2 to 7 years in prison. He now appeals. Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant upon the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record, defense counsel’s brief and defendant’s pro se submission, we find that there is at least one potential issue of arguable merit concerning the severity of the sentence. Consequently, without expressing an opinion as to the ultimate merit of this issue, we grant counsel’s application to be relieved of his assignment and shall assign new counsel to address this issue and any other nonfrivolous issues the record may disclose (see People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]; People v Smith, 32 AD3d 553 [2006]; People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]). Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. ORDERED that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.

People v Dippolito

Decided and Entered: February 15, 2007 16537 ________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v RICHARD DIPPOLITO, Appellant. ________________________________ Cale.....

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal

Decided and Entered: February 15, 2007
16537

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,
v
RICHARD DIPPOLITO, Appellant.

Cale.....