Matter of Evans v Goord

Decided and Entered: June 28, 2007 501611 ________________________________ In the Matter of GARY EVANS, Petitioner, v GLENN S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents. ___________________________ Calendar Date: May 16, 2007 Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ. __________ Gary Evans, Gowanda, petitioner pro se. Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Nancy A. Spiegel of counsel), for respondents. __________ Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating facility visiting procedures, creating a disturbance, harassment and refusing a direct order in violation of prison disciplinary rules. We confirm. The misbehavior report with a factually specific account of the incident written by the correction officer involved and endorsed by a witness employee, along with the testimony of the two witnessing correction officers, provides substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966 [1990]; Matter of Goncalves v Donnelly, 9 AD3d 721 [2004]). Petitioner’s exculpatory statements as to the nature of the events and the testimony of his inmate witnesses presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Miller v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 295 AD2d 714, 714-715 [2002]). Petitioner’s procedural objections are unpersuasive. The record demonstrates that the hearing was conducted in a fair and impartial manner and the determination did not flow from any bias on the part of the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Cayenne v Goord, 16 AD3d 782, 783-784 [2005]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, to the extent preserved, have been reviewed and determined to be without merit. Mercure, J.P., Peters, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.