WASHINGTON – The government-appointed panel investigating the roots of the financial crisis found that the meltdown occurred because government officials and Wall Street executives ignored warning signs and failed to manage risks.
The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission established by Congress determined that the crisis could have been avoided. Instead, the country fell into the deepest recession since the 1930s and millions of people lost their jobs, the panel said in a report released yesterday.
The Bush and Clinton administrations, the current and previous Federal Reserve chairmen, and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner all bear some responsibility for allowing the crisis, the panel said.
It also criticized bankers who became rich by creating trillions of dollars in risky investments. The deals grew so complex that bank executives and regulators did not understand them, the report found, and banks discouraged aggressive oversight of their activities, arguing the government’s interference would stifle financial innovation.
Still, the commission’s findings were tainted by partisan politics. Six Democrats on the panel supported the conclusions; the four Republicans dissented. The inquiry commission was created by Congress in 2009 to delve into the causes of the financial crisis.
In a dissent, three Republican commissioners blamed a global credit bubble fed by low interest rates. A separate lone dissent blamed policies aimed at promoting homeownership, including the government’s support of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
The panel has referred cases of possible criminal wrongdoing to the U.S. Department of Justice for investigation.
The commission’s chairman, Phil Angelides, told reporters that the group “fulfilled our obligations and referred matters to the appropriate authorities.”
The conclusions contradicted a parade of witnesses in the panel’s hearings who said the crisis could not have been avoided or prevented. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. CEO Lloyd Blankfein were among those who asserted that defense.
“The greatest tragedy would be to accept the refrain that no one could have seen this coming and thus nothing could have been done,” the report said. “If we accept this notion, it will happen again.”
The report detailed numerous warning signs that were ignored, among them: an explosion in risky subprime mortgage lending, an unsustainable rise in housing prices, widespread reports of unscrupulous lending practices, steep increases in homeowners’ mortgage debt and a spike in Wall Street firms’ trading activities, especially in high-risk financial products.
“A combination of excessive borrowing, risky investments and lack of transparency put the financial system on a collision course with crisis,” the report said.
The commission criticized the view held by some regulators that markets are “self-correcting” and banks can police themselves. Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan pushed this hands-off approach for decades, at the urging of the financial industry, the report said.
As investments grew more complex, regulators allowed large segments of markets to develop with little oversight. That prevented them from seeing the problem early, or responding effectively, the report found.
A prime example was the Fed’s failure to stanch the flow of risky subprime mortgages. The complex investments backed by those mortgages were barely understood by regulators and banking executives. They relied heavily on opinions from credit rating agencies.
The Fed was the only entity that could impose higher standards on mortgage lenders, the report said. Doing so would have slowed the torrent of deals that fed the crisis.
The commission is releasing more than its final report, as it begins putting online a trove of investigative documents.
Lawyers for companies at the center of the crisis have wondered what might become of the internal documents, which could be of interest to the plaintiffs’ bar. Many of those companies have already been battling proposed securities class actions.
The archive appears on the website of the commission, hundreds of documents were already up yesterday, including testimonies and court filings. Mr. Angelides, said the commission would be posting more, including “research and investigative documents, audio and transcripts.”
Lisa Rickard, president of the U.S. Chamber’s Institute for Legal Reform, criticized that plan. “The commission’s final report and its pledge to post raw materials—apparently including information obtained from companies as well as other government agencies—is an astounding abuse of process that would effectively create a government-sanctioned Wikileaks,” she said in a formal statement.
Mr. Angelides did not address those concerns during the news conference, and a spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
According to the commission’s website, it reviewed millions of pages of documents, interviewed more than 700 witnesses and held 19 days of public hearings in New York, Washington, D.C., and elsewhere. The panel also reviewed the work about the crisis developed by congressional committees, government agencies, academics, journalists, legal investigators and others.
A book version of the 662-page website is available at www.fcic.gov/report and in bookstores.