New Revenue Streams: Transform unprofitable practices into thriving businesses
Learn how Gen AI can help lawyers to transform unprofitable practices into new revenue streams.
September 03, 2024 at 08:45 AM
4 minute read
Law Firms - LargeThe original version of this story was published on Law.com
Law firm leaders perceive that generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) technology is going to have a dramatic impact on how efficiently lawyers are able to complete work assignments for clients. The top priorities for law firms using AI-powered tech are all related to efficiency, according to the 2024 LexisNexis Investing in Legal Innovation Survey:
- Legal research (57%)
- Summarizing documents (53%)
- Drafting documents (38%)
These anticipated gains in efficiency have the potential to benefit clients who will receive legal counsel faster, as well as law firms who may be able to expand into new practice areas or even rehabilitate certain practices that have been struggling.
Transform pressured practice areas
The ability to practice more efficiently has law firms eyeing Gen AI's potential to support their business growth opportunities, according to the new report, Gen AI in Law: Unlocking New Revenues.
A quarter of Am Law 200 firm leaders say using Gen AI for business development reports is a top priority, with 21% saying they want to use Gen AI for real-time comparisons of law across different jurisdictions and connecting AI to organizational data.
"I expect that we'll see a focus on new lines of business and on advisory services that are proactive, rather than reactive," says Jeff Pfeifer, chief product officer at LexisNexis.
Gen AI could also help practice areas where margins are under pressure to become more profitable through repeatable process improvements.
"We hear this consistently among the firms that we're speaking with: they're looking for ways technologies can make a material improvement in work quality and work efficiency," adds Pfeifer. "Doing so makes those lines of business more attractive from a margin perspective."
For example, legal professionals who use Gen AI tools and services from LexisNexis typically free up seven to 11 hours per week, which Pfeifer notes can be used to either follow-up more rapidly on their next tasks or to expand services for other clients.
Clients expecting higher-value work
According to the Gen AI in Law: Unlocking New Revenues report, in-house teams also expect to see Gen AI tools free up their outside lawyers' time so they can focus on higher value work.
"We don't look at AI or Gen AI as being replacements to attorneys, but rather tools that augment what those attorneys are able to do with their own time," says Christy Jo Gedney, senior manager at Liberty Mutual Insurance. "We want our attorneys, whether they're in-house or outside counsel, to be practicing at the top of their licenses. We want them spending their time doing the things that are impactful, such as building relationships or prepping for trial. Using Gen AI tools will help give them the capacity to spend their time on more impactful matters."
For example, McGuireWoods is starting to see notable efficiency gains through adopting Gen AI for M&A due diligence by reviewing hundreds of contracts much faster than would be possible with a team of humans.
"The ability to use AI to surgically go into each one of those contracts and extract the information that you need and organize it into a spreadsheet as the first step of diligence can be a huge time saver," says Peter Geovanes, chief innovation and AI officer at McGuireWoods.
We interviewed a variety of AI leaders from the legal profession to explore how law firms and corporations that embrace Legal AI can generate new revenues through the use of this technology. In addition to the section of the report we unpacked today, which explores how to transform unprofitable practice areas into thriving businesses, other sections of the report include:
- An introduction to your new business development tool;
- Adapting to changing client mindsets about how to assess the value of legal work;
- How to seize new opportunities with the right skills in place; and
- Why law firms should start business innovation now to maximize success.
Read the full report now: Gen AI in Law: Unlocking New Revenues.
To read more insights and thought leadership from Lexis+ Ai, click here.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHolland & Knight Snags 2 Insurance Partners in New York and Philadelphia From Goodwin
3 minute read200 Hrs. of Partner Prep Guides Quinn Emanuel's Incredibly Detailed Mock Bankruptcy Trial
Managing Partners of New York—How Have You Fared Over The Past Year? Let Us Know With Our Annual Survey
1 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 5Inside Track: Late-Career In-House Leaders Offer Words to Live by
Who Got The Work
Eleanor M. Lackman of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp has entered an appearance for Canon, the Japanese camera maker, and the Brooklyn Nets in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Sept. 16 in California Central District Court by T-Rex Law on behalf of technology company Phinge Corporation, pursues claims against the defendants for their ongoing use of the 'Netaverse' mark. The suit contends that the defendants' use of the mark in connection with a virtual reality platform will likely create consumer confusion. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, is 2:24-cv-07917, Phinge Corporation v. Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network, LLC et al.
Who Got The Work
Fox Rothschild partner Glenn S. Grindlinger has entered an appearance for Garage Management Company in a pending lawsuit over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The case was filed Aug. 31 in New York Southern District Court by the Abdul Hassan Law Group on behalf of a manual worker who contends that he was not properly compensated for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, is 1:24-cv-06610, Bailey v. Garage Management Company LLC.
Who Got The Work
Veronica M. Keithley of Stoel Rives has entered an appearance for Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC in a pending environmental lawsuit. The suit, filed Aug. 12 in Washington Western District Court by Kampmeier & Knutsen on behalf of Communities for a Healthy Bay, seeks to declare that the defendant has violated the Clean Water Act by releasing stormwater discharges on Puget Sound and Commencement Bay. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle, is 3:24-cv-05662, Communities for a Healthy Bay v. Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC.
Who Got The Work
Caroline Pignatelli of Cooley has entered an appearance for law firm Cooley, partner Matt Hallinan, retired partner Michael Tu and a pair of Cooley associates in a pending fraud lawsuit related to the firm's representation of startup company Carbon IQ and founder Benjamin Cantey. The case, filed Sept. 26 in New Jersey District Court by the DalCortivo Law Offices on behalf of Gould Ventures and member Jason Gould, contends that the defendants deliberately or recklessly concealed critical information from the plaintiffs regarding fraud allegations against Cantey. Gould claims that he would not have accepted a position on Carbon IQ's board of directors or made a 2022 investment in the company if the fraud allegations had been disclosed. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Kirsch, is 3:24-cv-09485, Gould Ventures, LLC et al v. Cooley, LLP et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to represent PDD Holdings, the operator of online marketplaces Pinduoduo and Temu, in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Sept. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Labaton Keller Sucharow and VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, contends that the defendants concealed information that rendered the growth of PDD unsustainable and posed substantial risks to PDD’s business, including merchant policies that made it unprofitable for vendors to do business on PDD platforms; malware issues on PDD applications; and PDD’s failure to implement effective compliance systems. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-06881, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250