This decision involved in action for a declaratory judgment and a permanent injunction. The plaintiff, a commercial tenant, moved for a Yellowstone injunction “tolling the period within which to cure the breach of the lease between the parties.” The landlord had served a Notice to Cure dated Oct. 28, 2021.

The tenant alleged that because it was “diligently attempting to cure the breach in question, the lapse of insurance coverage required by the lease—a Yellowstone injunction is warranted to preserve the status quo, namely, its valuable leasehold.”