The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has ruled that followers of the Falun Gong modern spiritual practice cannot use a provision of federal law to designate their protest sites as places of worship in order to avoid counter-demonstrations in Queens.
The decision, from a three-judge panel of the Manhattan-based appeals court, overturned a 2018 ruling by the late Brooklyn federal Judge Jack B. Weinstein, who held on summary judgment that five tables the group had set up on a Queens sidewalk qualified as a “place of religious worship” under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]