More than a year has passed since the Court of Appeals’ landmark ruling in Matter of Regina Metro. Co., LLC v. New York State Div. of Housing & Community Renewal, 35 NY3d 332 (2020). In Regina, the court held that Part F of the HSTPA, relating to rent overcharge claims, could not be applied retroactively to pre-HSTPA overcharges.
The First Department has since issued various decisions interpreting the scope of Regina. Although the Court of Appeals will have the final say as to what Regina means, the First Department’s interpretations thereof constitute controlling authority in Manhattan and the Bronx. This article will discuss two lines of cases, both relating to the issue of fraud as it impacts the four-year look-back rule.
A Fraudulent Scheme To Do What, Exactly?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]