Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Sharon M. Porcellio Sharon M. Porcellio

Pertinent to the financial distress facing many as the result of COVID-19, this column will address a case from the fair debt collection arena: Kurzdorfer v. Constar Financial Services, No. 19-CV-6430L, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178015 (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 28, 2020). In Kurzdorfer, U.S. Senior District Judge David G. Larimer considered whether a debt collector could issue two collection letters within one 30-day period or if this course of action was inherently false, confusing and/or misleading to a debtor. In his decision, he also considered whether that behavior by a debt collector was a proper expansion of the baseline rights provided to a debtor under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). In answering these questions, he reinforced an existing body of case law and dismissed the findings of an outlier case from in the Eastern District of Wisconsin, therefore not controlling in Second Circuit.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Law Firms Mentioned


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.