Photo: Getty Images/iStockphoto
The oral arguments on Friday in the Western District of New York concerned statements from Kevin Kendall, who was accused of repeatedly using the N-word while on the job. But Kendall’s attorney, pushing back, argues the limited frequency of the comments do not meet the high bar required to establish a hostile work environment.
August 19, 2020 at 06:21 PM
1 minute read
Attorneys in federal court last week went back-and-forth over the context of a repeated racist slur allegedly said by a white former senior investigator at the New York State Police.
The oral arguments, conducted during a remote hearing on Friday in the Western District of New York, concerned statements from Kevin Kendall, who was accused of repeatedly using the N-word while on the job.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
