Attorneys for President Donald Trump argued in a court filing Monday that a Manhattan grand jury’s subpoena of his tax records was a “wildly overbroad” and bad-faith attempt to harass the president.
The filing laid out Trump’s constitutional arguments for nixing the 2018 subpoena of Trump’s accounting firm Mazars, after the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this month rejected, in a 7-2 vote, the president’s claim that he was immune from state prosecution.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]