CLOSEClose New York Law Journal Menu
 
X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Joel Cohen Joel Cohen

The last chapter on the Michael Flynn prosecution has hardly been written. Litigation over the case is far from over, especially with the appointment of amicus John Gleeson to basically “take the other side” and Beth Wilkinson to represent Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in a mandamus action brought against him by Flynn. And at least until all the books are fully written, and beyond, there will remain hard questions on both sides of the divide. Should the Mueller/FBI investigation have been initiated in the first place? Was it an overly aggressive effort by the FBI and later Robert Mueller’s team to “get Flynn” at all costs, and even to possibly get Donald Trump himself? And, coming from the other side, was the Justice Department’s decision to dismiss the indictment informed, or perhaps merely compromised, by the Trump Administration’s politically-driven decision to undermine the Mueller/FBI investigation? All in the name of Trump’s remaining in office and getting re-elected.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.