Coronavirus Surge in Legal Cases
The number of jobless workers has swelled during the pandemic to levels not seen since the Great Depression. Many people are already confused about how to access the myriad of state and federal public benefits, including stimulus monies, and interpret moratoriums that are essential to their shelter, health and well-being.
June 04, 2020 at 09:24 AM
4 minute read
Just as COVID-19 disproportionately impacts the health of the poor and minorities, so too it is giving rise to an unprecedented demand for legal services by those who cannot afford to pay for an attorney. These individuals require legal assistance for an ever-growing range of matters and disputes, at a moment in time when they (along with the rest of society) grieve over the death and despair caused by the crisis.
In response to this enormous challenge, the courts, organized bar and legal services organizations have acted swiftly and comprehensively. For example, the New York State Bar Association ("NYSBA") is working in partnership with the state's Unified Court System, the Governor's office, and legal service providers to ensure increased demand for legal services, especially among the poor and minorities, can be met as New York recovers. To this end, NYSBA has developed a statewide pro network of volunteer attorneys to meet the demand in those areas where the greatest surge in new cases is anticipated.
Currently, demand for legal help on unemployment-related issues has been an acute area of need. Many are daunted by the process and have turned to civil legal aid and pro bono attorneys for guidance. Some organizations have seen about three hundred percent or higher increase in volume covering a wide range of unemployment benefits issues. Common issues are eligibility determination and appealing denials.
The number of jobless workers has swelled during the pandemic to levels not seen since the Great Depression. Many people are already confused about how to access the myriad of state and federal public benefits, including stimulus monies, and interpret moratoriums that are essential to their shelter, health and well-being.
To address this need, NYSBA has established a program that matches volunteer pro bono attorneys with persons whose unemployment claims have been denied, through an innovative website. A similar program is being stood up to provide pro bono assistance for the families of those who lost loved ones, in small Surrogate Courts and estate matters. Nearly 1,000 attorneys have volunteered their time and expertise to these initiatives.
Of course, civil legal aid is the backbone and most critical component of New York's efforts to provide justice for all. New York's legal service providers' budgets are based on as much as 70% of state funds to provide free services to low-income New Yorkers. Before the pandemic, these legal aid organizations were already unable to serve 61% of low-income New Yorkers who needed their assistance. As the fallout from the COVID-19 unfolds, we anticipate that the gap between those that need legal help, and those that can afford it, will dramatically increase.
Increased efficiency alone will be not be enough. With a projected $61 billion revenue shortage through 2024, New York needs the federal government to do its part in helping states recover by providing stimulus funding.
Even before the pandemic, legal services programs for low-income New Yorkers were stretched to the brink, where less than half the needs could be met. Post pandemic, any proposed cuts to these programs will disproportionately affect people in low-income communities holding high risk positions in health care, grocery stores, cleaning and delivery. Many of these people have gotten sick, lost their jobs or don't make enough to support their families. When legal proceedings surge against frontline workers, New York state must ensure that their basic civil legal needs can be met.
Henry M. Greenberg, past president of the New York State Bar Association
Lillian Moy, executive director of the Legal Aid Society of Northeastern New York
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorney Responds to Outten & Golden Managing Partner's Letter on Dropped Client
3 minute readLetter to the Editor: Law Journal Used Misleading Photo for Article on Election Observers
1 minute readNYC's Administrative Court's to Publish Some Rulings in the New York Law Journal Is Welcomed. But It Should Go Further
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Nevada Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Groundbreaking Contingency Cap Ballot Measure
- 2OpenAI Tells Court It Will Seek to Consolidate Copyright Suits Under MDL
- 34th Circuit Allows State Felon Voting Ban Challenge to Go Forward
- 4Class Actions Claim Progressive Undervalues Totaled Cars
- 5How the Trump II Administration Can Combat Antisemitism
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250