X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Warren Estis, left, and Alexander Lycoyannis. Courtesy photos Warren Estis, left, and Alexander Lycoyannis. Courtesy photos

The COVID-19 pandemic has elicited vigorous legislative responses at the federal, state and local levels. Among this legislation is a New York City law enacted on May 26, 2020 which purports to temporarily suspend personal guaranty provisions contained in commercial leases. However, questions may exist as to whether the law is consistent with the United States and New York Constitutions. And, even if it passes constitutional muster, the law appears to have been drafted poorly and with a limited understanding of the issues it aims to address.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Law Firms Mentioned

 

New York Law JournalBook

New York Law Journal, serving the bench and the bar since 1888

Get More Information
 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.