Intelligence Community Adapts to New Realities of Security Clearance Evaluation Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic
While the pandemic will continue to cause delays with investigations and adjudications, those seeking to gain or maintain a clearance will be expected to adhere to requirements of the process in a timely manner.
May 14, 2020 at 02:55 PM
6 minute read
Security clearances will almost certainly become an even more valuable credential as our economy transforms amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The ever-increasing desirability of a security clearance has raised the stakes for those looking to gain or maintain a clearance in these economically uncertain times. Clearance holders have access to an exclusive and lucrative job market and on average earn close to $40,000 more than their counterparts without a clearance according to a recent survey conducted by the website ClearanceJobs. As national security attorney Mark Zaid lamented, "I call security clearances the Willy Wonka golden ticket … It opens incredible doors that otherwise would never be opened, and they typically have a bigger pot of gold at the end of the rainbow than non-cleared positions."
While well over 30 million Americans have filed initial unemployment claims since mid-March, those employed in jobs that require a security clearance remain largely insulated from the economic volatility caused by the pandemic. Clearance holders and applicants with an eye toward the value and stability of a job with a clearance already understood the obstacles facing them as they moved through the vetting and reevaluation processes. As of the fourth quarter of 2019 the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) took an average of almost 10 months to completely evaluate an application for a TS clearance. The already laborious process now faces new challenges as social distancing measures continue change the way clearances are investigated and adjudicated.
The COVID-19 pandemic has forced national security officials to adapt the way they oversee and adjudicate security clearances. Personnel vetting, interim clearances, periodic reviews, continuous evaluations, and adjudicative matters will all proceed, albeit in a manner almost unimaginable before the pandemic. DCSA has begun to rely increasingly upon tools like VTC, and a remote workforce, in order to conduct investigations. Adjudicative agencies have also begun to consider the adverse economic effects COVID-19 has had on clearance-holders and applicants' finances. Additionally, written replies to denial decisions, revocations, and suspension decisions continue to be evaluated, although in-person hearings have been postponed until further notice.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All- Cuomo Offers 4-Phase Plan to 'Reopen' NY, With Professional Services in Step 2
- Discrimination Against Employees Without COVID-19 Antibodies
- Equitably Distributing Business Values Post Pandemic
- Judge Rejects Feds' Bid to Quash Health Report on Brooklyn Federal Lockup
- Cuomo Announces Closure of Schools Through End of Academic Year
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250