Warren A. Estis and Jeffrey Turkel
On April 2, the Court of Appeals issued its landmark decision in Regina Metropolitan Co. v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal where it held that retroactive application of Part F of the 2019 HSTPA violated the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The majority and dissenting opinions are not easily summarized, however, in this article, Warren Estis and Jeffrey Turkel explain what the majority did, and did not, primarily hold.
May 05, 2020 at 11:53 AM
1 minute read
On April 2, 2020, the Court of Appeals issued its landmark decision in Regina Metropolitan Co., LLC v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal. In its 4-3 ruling, the court held that retroactive application of Part F of the 2019 HSTPA violated the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
The majority and dissenting opinions run 109 pages, and are not easily summarized. This article will explain what the majority did, and did not, primarily hold.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
