NY Law Grads Can Do 'Limited' Legal Work Under Supervision, Chief Judge Says
As a result of bar exam delays, recent law graduates will be authorized to engage in the "limited practice of law" under the supervision of a more experienced lawyer.
April 28, 2020 at 07:26 PM
3 minute read
The chief judge in New York state said Tuesday that recent law graduates who had planned to take the bar exam this summer will be temporarily allowed to practice law under the supervision of a qualified attorney until testing delays and capacity constraints are resolved.
Chief Judge Janet DiFiore, who previously delayed the state's July bar exam to Sept. 9 and 10, said travel and public gatherings constraints due to the COVID-19 pandemic would likely limit the number of people could take the exam. "Seating capacity for the September examination is likely to be limited," the court said.
In response, the judge has approved a "comprehensive and streamlined program designed to provide temporary authorization for qualified law graduates to engage in the limited practice of law," the court announced in an email Tuesday.
"Practice orders promulgated by the Appellate Division departments will allow all covered candidates employed in New York to work under the supervision of a qualified attorney in good standing who has been admitted to practice law in New York for at least three years," the email said. "Temporary authorization will be available to all first-time takers of the bar examination, including both J.D. and LL.M. candidates, irrespective of their graduation year."
Full details of the program weren't immediately available, but the judiciary said law grads would be temporarily authorized through their swearing-in date, "so long as those candidates pass their first bar examination no later than 2021 and promptly seek admission to the bar following the release of exam results."
The announcement follows reports that DiFiore had been considering such a measure as part of the judiciary's response to the pandemic. About 10,000 law graduates would have taken the July exam under normal circumstances.
The judiciary said it's possible that not everyone who wants to take the September exam will be able, however. It said public safety measures will likely "prevent us from maximizing space in our larger testing venues across the state." As a result, the court encouraged candidates to take the exam elsewhere or later on.
"Candidates are encouraged to consider taking the Uniform Bar Examination at a later date or in other jurisdictions that may be better positioned to accommodate test-takers," the statement said. "While we understand the considerable stress and uncertainty caused by these limitations, the health and safety of all participants must remain our top priority."
There are already some indications that it won't be business as usual at some of the biggest law firms that hire new lawyers by the dozen, however. For instance, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe and Baker Botts are among firms saying they are delaying the start date for first-year associates until 2021.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Primer on Searches and Investigations by Law Enforcement Agencies
10 minute readLinklaters Duo Jumps to Reed Smith's Structured Finance Practice
Labaton’s Eric Belfi on Running Case Investigation, Analysis and Delaware Presence
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1People in the News—Dec. 6, 2024—Hamburg Rubin, Pietragallo Gordon
- 2How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'Serve Your Firm the Same Way You Serve Your Clients,' Says Mark Salah Morgan of Day Pitney
- 3Where Can I File Suit for My Client? Venue Selection in Pa. and the Issue of Forum Non Conveniens
- 4'Basic Arithmetic': Court Rules in Favor of LA Charter School Denied Funding by California Education Department
- 5The One Rule to Rule Them All in Jury Trials
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250