Scott E. Mollen
Scott E. Mollen, a partner at Herrick, Feinstein, discusses "Dunu v. 583 Riverside Dr.," where the court dismissed the matter, not finding that the landlord's service of rent demand to be frivolous; and "Adirondack Wild v. New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conserv.," where a rational basis existed for the DEC's decision that motorized vehicles could be used in scenic river corridors.
March 24, 2020 at 02:01 PM
1 minute read
A petitioner tenant asserted that service of a rent demand constituted harassment and that she did not owe any rent.
She introduced into evidence a demand for payment of rent that a landlord had served pursuant to Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law §711(2). She asserted that service of the rent demand “constituted harassment” and that she did not owe rent to the landlord.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
