SDNY Issues New Restrictions to Increase Social Distancing at Courthouses
Criminal case operations would be limited to processing new arrests, arraignments, bail appeals and emergency matters, according to new court guidance, and steps would be taken to increase physical distance between persons.
March 20, 2020 at 04:49 PM
3 minute read
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York announced Friday that it would be limiting most in-court hearings to its largest courtrooms in Manhattan and White Plains, as it seeks to expand social-distancing measures and scale back operations in the face of the growing coronavirus outbreak.
In a new memo, Chief Judge Colleen McMahon said that, starting Monday, March 23, criminal case operations would be limited to processing new arrests, arraignments, bail appeals and emergency matters.
In multiple defendant cases, the memo said, only two defendants would be arraigned at a time. Observers to the proceedings would be required to sit in designated seats, in order to "preserve social distancing procedures," and attorneys would be allowed to request to participate remotely.
All arraignments would take place before the on-duty magistrate judge in Courtroom 24B at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse in Lower Manhattan, instead of the smaller courtroom typically used on the building's fifth floor.
All other in-court matters would be held in the largest courtrooms in Manhattan and White Plains.
Civil court operations, meanwhile, would proceed at the discretion of the judges assigned to individual cases. In-court appearances would be "limited strictly" to emergency matters, although even these should be conducted by teleconference or video conference, if possible, the memo said.
The court's emergency civil part would continue to operate in the two Foley Square courthouses, though its hours would be limited to 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Court-ordered mediation will no longer take place in the federal courthouses, and attorneys were encouraged to use alternate locations and methods for convening sessions.
The latest restrictions build on earlier efforts by McMahon to maintain essential court functions and protect staff during the novel coronavirus outbreak. All new civil and criminal trials in the district have been postponed, and access to the courthouse has been severely curtailed to prevent the virus from spreading within its walls.
The U.S. Court of Appeals, meanwhile, is closed to the public, and the court announced Thursday that it would hear all oral arguments remotely for the duration of the crisis.
Read More:
NY State Courts to End 'Nonessential' Services in Coronavirus Response
Citing Coronavirus, Advocates Call for Release of Aging and Medically Vulnerable Inmates
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCan Law Firms Avoid Landing on 'Enemy' List During the Trump Administration?
5 minute readDeluge of Trump-Leery Government Lawyers Join Job Market, Setting Up Free-for-All for Law Firm, In-House Openings
4 minute readThe Lawyers Picked (So Far) by Trump for Key Roles in His Second Administration
5 minute readTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250