(Photo: BigStock)
The Appellate Division, First Department said that it was "wholly speculative" that the plaintiff in the malpractice suit would have gotten a different result in his underlying personal injury trial if the law firm had prepared a key witness differently.
March 03, 2020 at 06:43 PM
1 minute read
Staff reporter
Alexander Wulwick, an attorney in Manhattan, represented Caso, according to the panel’s Feb. 27 decision. He declined to comment on Tuesday.
Theodore Friedman, a Manhattan-based lawyer who also represents Caso in the litigation, said in part in an email on Tuesday that, in his view, “the Appellate Division[, First Department]‘s current short opinion contains numerous misapprehensions of the facts and record.”
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
