X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Stephen M. Kramarsky Stephen M. Kramarsky

Intellectual property, by its very nature, tends to pose challenges that traditional property does not. If I want to protect my valuable possessions, I can lock them up in a safe or install an alarm in my house. But the protection of intellectual property is not that simple. Of course, it is possible to protect the tangible forms intellectual property might take: a sound recording or customer list or source code implementation of a computer algorithm can be locked away in a physical or virtual vault. But the value of intellectual property typically comes from its use, not from the scarcity of any one physical copy of it. And since the entire concept of restricted use is a creation of law, it falls to the courts to figure out where that concept begins and ends. This determination often takes place in the context of a proceeding for an injunction.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Law Firms Mentioned

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.