A great value to subscribers of the New York Law Journal is the daily expert analyses on pages three and four that delve into complex issues of evolving law. The authors of these articles are highly knowledgeable, citing accurate supporting statutory authority, case law and underlying foundational principles. Attorneys archive these articles as reliable, authoritative references for litigation strategy, future court submissions and advice to clients.

In a recent article, however, Filing Interlocutory Appeals in Child Custody Cases (Dec. 18, 2019), the authors misstate foundational appellate procedure, citing case law from foreign jurisdictions that is antithetical to New York law.