Move to Bar ICE Arrests at State Courthouses Gains Momentum Among NY Lawmakers
It's significant that the prevalence of ICE in and around state courthouses remained high last year, compared to previous years, because state court officials had actually instituted new rules intended to prevent those arrests.
January 14, 2020 at 04:18 PM
6 minute read
Legislation that would bar federal immigration authorities from arresting undocumented immigrants in and around state courthouses in New York without a judicial warrant has gained momentum in Albany, with a majority of lawmakers now signed on to sponsor the measure.
The bill, called the Protect Our Courts Act, now has support from more than half of lawmakers in both the state Assembly and Senate, making its chances of passing more likely than ever.
Assemblywoman Michaelle Solages, D-Queens, said Tuesday that she expects the measure to be approved this year after more of her colleagues offered their support. It was first introduced two years ago, but has since failed to gain traction.
"I think this year is the year to do it," Solages said. "We have a lot of momentum and a lot of support. Especially since we now have other legislative initiatives in place, it's now time to take that next step and make sure our courthouses are protected."
The measure now has 80 sponsors in the State Assembly, which is more than half of the 150-member chamber. In the Senate, the measure has 34 sponsors. It only needs 32 votes in the chamber to pass.
Deputy Senate Majority Leader Michael Gianaris, D-Queens, said he's planning to push for the bill to become law this year.
"I will do everything in my power to make this happen," Gianaris said.
The bill is carried in the State Senate by Sen. Brad Hoylman, D-Manhattan. Hoylman, who also chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Tuesday he's also confident lawmakers will approve the measure this year. It's his third year sponsoring the bill.
Hoylman, speaking at a press conference, went after U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which has ramped up deportation efforts in New York and around the country in recent years. Hoylman said New York's court should be off limits.
"Our courthouses should be sanctuaries for justice, not hunting grounds for ICE to round up members of the immigrant community," Hoylman said.
The comments came the same day that new data was released from the Immigrant Defense Project on the prevalence of civil arrests by federal immigration authorities in and around state courthouses in New York.
The report found that there's been a 1700% increase in the number of incidents involving ICE in and around state courthouses in New York since 2016. The data, obtained from New York state, tracked arrests and sightings each year from 2016 through the end of last year.
The largest spike in ICE courthouse operations was seen in Rockland County, where there was a sevenfold increase over the year before. Nassau, Suffolk and Westchester Counties also experienced an increase in ICE courthouse operations.
It's significant that the prevalence of ICE in and around state courthouses remained high last year, compared to previous years, because state court officials had actually instituted new rules intended to prevent those arrests.
The state Office of Court Administration, last April, administered a directive that required federal immigration authorities to first seek a judicial warrant before attempting to conduct a civil arrest at a state courthouse in New York. Administrative warrants aren't enough.
Mizue Aizeki, deputy director at the Immigrant Defense Project, said the data showed that ICE was not phased by the directive from OCA.
"Despite that directive, ICE did whatever it could to get around it," Aizeki said.
Rather than enter courthouses to make arrests, ICE was found to have targeted immigrants directly outside the building. The directive from OCA does not protect immigrants from civil arrests outside state courthouses.
The report found, as a result, that approximately 80% of total arrests by ICE at state courthouses happened when an immigrant was either on their way into a courthouse, or leaving the building.
The Immigrant Defense Project also claimed that it received reports of sightings where ICE did not make themselves known to court staff, which is also required by the directive.
They also documented instances where immigrants were taken by federal immigration authorities, who showed up in plainclothes and vehicles that weren't marked. At a press conference, lawmakers likened it to a kidnapping.
"We are in the midst of a human rights crisis," Aizeki said. "ICE will go to any means to fulfill their mass deportation agenda."
The Protect Our Courts Act would require ICE agents to identify themselves as federal immigration officers before making a civil arrest. It would also require, like the OCA directive, that ICE officers first receive a judicial warrant before making such an arrest.
But the proposed law would go further than the directive by prohibiting civil arrests by ICE immediately outside courthouses as well. The legislation reads that agents wouldn't be allowed to arrest someone who's either on their way to court, or leaving the building.
"Now with the OCA directive, I think it gives us greater support that we need to codify that in law and create a zone of protection so that ICE agents that are now going across the street won't be able to do that," Solages said.
A spokesman for ICE said Tuesday that federal law allows them to arrest immigrants in courthouses, regardless of what state lawmakers in New York decide to enact.
"ICE officers have been provided broad at-large arrest authority by Congress and may lawfully arrest removable aliens in courthouses, which is often necessitated by local policies that prevent law enforcement from cooperating with ICE efforts to arrange for a safe and orderly transfer of custody in the setting of a state or county prison or jail and put political rhetoric before public safety," the spokesman said.
The legislation is currently pending in the Codes Committee of the State Senate, but could come up for a vote in the Assembly at any time.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNYC's Administrative Court's to Publish Some Rulings in the New York Law Journal Is Welcomed. But It Should Go Further
4 minute readSidley Austin Scores Landmark Civil Rights Verdict Against Prolonged Solitary Confinement in State Prisons
Cuomo Spokesman Sues Wigdor, Alleging Their Lawsuit on Behalf of Trooper Was 'Legally Baseless'
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250